Comment list (make your own entries)
(1) A URL link to the comment (this link can be created by clicking on the time & date at the bottom of your comment on the tan individual post pages -- not on the white comment entry pages).
(2) Your name
(3) The title and maybe the date of the opening post under which your comment was placed
(4)The date and time of your comment
(5) A post "label" (category) at the bottom of the opening post
(6) A brief summary of your comment
In some ways, this is even better than having an automatic list because (1) the commenters decide what information to put in the listings, (2) the commenters can write summaries of the comments, and (3) the listings are permanent.
I tried this idea before but did not post a link in the left sidebar and I think that is what killed the idea.
Labels: Special blog features
14 Comments:
My comment is here. I argue that the Supreme Court was incorrect in ruling that attorney fee awards to plaintiffs in civil rights cases should never be reduced on the grounds that the plaintiff's legal representation was pro bono and/or from a non-profit organization.
But you don't make your case.
>>>>> But you don't make your case. <<<<<
VIW, future extraneous comments in this list will be deleted without trace. I created this list for a specific purpose and I intend to see that it is used only for that purpose.
Comment posted under "Page view record broken." The effort to have "Of Pandas and People" -- the ID book that was central to the Kitzmiller case -- listed as a banned book is discussed.
Comment under post titled "Law journal paper by Wexler cites censorial Panda's Thumb blog."
This comment discusses the general asininity of ViW's comments.
I posted a response to LArry's (inane) comment referred to in #5
Manuel
> VIW, future extraneous comments in this list will be deleted without trace. <
Translation: I plan to practice arbitrary censorship.
> I created this list for a specific purpose and I intend to see that it is used only for that purpose. <
Translation: This has not gone the way that I had hoped so I will pick up my ball and go home.
Normally I would delete the preceding comment, but I am leaving it here to show the sickness of the trolls on this blog. The preceding comment is an impersonation of Jim Sherwood, one of this blog's biggest supporters. Jim would never say those things.
Comment under the post titled "Internet Censorship Hall of Shame." I reply to ViW's assertion that I am censoring him by not allowing him to insert his replies into this list.
You're damn right, as Larry said, that so-called comment is an impersonation of me.
I was impersonated on this blog on Sunday March 18, at 9:43:00 AM. See above.
So I'd like to point out that all of my genuine comments come from San Francisco, where I live: from the San Francisco Public Library, where I do all of my research. That's sfpl.org.
When I go to Larry's Site Meter and click on "Recent Visitors By Details," my comments show up as coming from sfpl.org. It's easy to verify that by checking the time of my comments.
Reply to comment of Heather Geesey, a Dover school board member.
this comment on "Darwinism is grossly overrrated" thread.
Post a Comment
<< Home