I am now unable to post comments on Conservapedia because my IP address is blocked there. The excuse: violation of the
"90/10 rule" -- i.e., large contributions to talk pages in comparison to contributions to the articles. I pointed out that I am new to Conservapedia and therefore have had no opportunity to contribute to the articles. Also, all of my comments on this
talk page have been responses to other commenters' responses to my comments, and most of my comments have been defensive. It is outrageous that I am now unable to defend myself against attacks on my positions in that talk page. Conservapedia rules are no better than Wikipedia rules.
The disreputable practice of IP address blocking is often ineffective and often unintentionally blocks other Internet users who share the same ISP proxy. It also discriminates against Internet users who use only one IP address. Anonymous proxies are sometimes -- but not always -- effective in evading IP address blocks, and have not been effective lately.
Labels: Citrate-eating E. coli, Wikipedia (new #2)
6 Comments:
> most of my comments have been defensive. <
No. Most of your comments, as here, are offensive. Try arguing your point logically unstead of just casting insults, dunghill.
Now comes the march of the sockpuppets.
And Larry meets his goal of getting banned at yet another site.
What's the point of having a "Conservapedia?" Wikipedia has a strong liberal slant or bias, but at least they're cunning enough not to say so, in their name.
The best definition was given by Ambrose Bierce, a writer who was thought to be a cynic, in his Devil's Dictionary:
"Conservative, n.--A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others."
At last, an intelligent post from JS. (I suspected he was capable.) :-)
"now comes the March of the Sockpuppets"
You're welcome.
Post a Comment
<< Home