Creationist outfit goes off deep end
"O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen."
I Timothy 6:20-21, KJV
"Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ."
II Corinthians 10:5, KJV
-- from the banner of the home page of the website of the Creation Science Association For Mid-America.
A previous post is about an article by Tom Willis in the newsletter of the Creation Science Association For Mid-America. A new article by Tom Willis -- titled "Evolutionists should not be allowed to roam free in the land" -- in the CSAFMA newsletter says,
Evolution is the apologetic system of the end time religion. It will not be eradicated. Well, not until the antichrist kills all of them in order to promote and make way for worship of himself.
Even then, it will not be the sane people (Christians) who will kill all the evolutionists, it will be the criminally insane folks who worship the antichrist, who will, incidentally, as the Bible predicts, be an Assyrian. Guess who will make up the bulk of the group who kills all the evolutionists! And what is the dominant religion in ancient Assyria and the rest of the countries to be allies of the antichrist? Hint: Every nation named in the Bible as a follower of the antichrist is Muslim today. Thus, it is my theory that it will not, of course, be Christians who kill all the evolutionists, but Muslims who delight in killing both evolutionists and Christians.
Nevertheless, I find it instructive and entertaining to analyze what should be done with evolutionists before their end comes. After all, they are manifestly the most dangerous and destructive people on the planet (well, OK, Muslims are strong competitors). Using their religion to dominate education, they have, as previously pointed out, killed more people than anybody in history . . . . .
We have learned:
Evolutionists are largely incompetent
They are largely unproductive leaches (sic) on the productive members of society, else they are totally destructive.
Where they have achieved, or even sought, political power they have virtually always been extremely dangerous to any opponents of their religion, even while pretending they do not have a religion, or pretending they are Christian.
They make it perfectly clear that they are at war and intend to remain at war with Christians and any other opponents of their religion.
Even where they have not achieved the power that their philosophical cousins (communists and Nazis) held, if you pay attention, they tend to make it clear that they believe that Christians, and any other opponents of their faith, ought to be eliminated.
Clearly, then, "evolutionists should not be allowed to roam free in the land." (emphasis in original) All that remains for us to discuss is "What should be done with evolutionists?" For the purposes of this essay, I will ignore the minor issue of Western-style jurisprudence and merely mention possible solutions to the "evolutionism problem," leaving the details to others:
Labor camps. Their fellow believers were high on these. But my position would be that most of them have lived their lives at, or near the public trough. So, after their own beliefs, their life should continue only as long as they can support themselves in the camps.
Require them to wear placards around their neck, or perhaps large medallions which prominently announce "Warning: Evolutionist! Mentally Incompetent -- Potentially Dangerous." I consider this option too dangerous.
Since evolutionists are liars and most do not really believe evolution we could employ truth serum or water-boarding to obtain confessions of evolution rejection. But this should, at most, result in parole, because, like Muslims, evolutionist religion permits them to lie if there is any benefit to them.
An Evolutionist Colony in Antarctica could be a promising option. Of course inspections would be required to prevent too much progress. They might invent gunpowder.
A colony on Mars would prevent gunpowder from harming anyone but their own kind, in the unlikely event they turned out to be intelligent enough to invent it.
All options should include 24-hour sound system playing Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris reading Darwin's "Origin of Species, or the preservation of Favored Races by Means of Natural Selection." Of course some will consider this cruel & unusual, especially since they will undoubtedly have that treatment for eternity.
Wow. I wonder what he thinks of Judge Jones.
But is Tom Willis really more bigoted than the Darwinists who push hardline evolution education policies -- dogmatic, hard sell, constantly in-your-face, evolution-is-central-to-biology, no weaknesses, no disclaimer statements, no-ifs-ands-or-buts, all-criticism-of-evolution-is-just-unconstitutional-religion, brainwashing, spoonfeeding, no-compromise kinds of policies? And is he really more bigoted than the Darwinists who persecute Darwin doubters in academia and government?
A list of CSAFMA newsletter articles is here. The newsletter dates back to 1992.
Labels: Evolution controversy (3 of 4)