I'm from Missouri

This site is named for the famous statement of US Congressman Willard Duncan Vandiver from Missouri : "I`m from Missouri -- you'll have to show me." This site is dedicated to skepticism of official dogma in all subjects. Just-so stories are not accepted here. This is a site where controversial subjects such as evolution theory and the Holocaust may be freely debated.

Name:
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States

My biggest motivation for creating my own blogs was to avoid the arbitrary censorship practiced by other blogs and various other Internet forums. Censorship will be avoided in my blogs -- there will be no deletion of comments, no closing of comment threads, no holding up of comments for moderation, and no commenter registration hassles. Comments containing nothing but insults and/or ad hominem attacks are discouraged. My non-response to a particular comment should not be interpreted as agreement, approval, or inability to answer.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Creationist outfit goes off deep end


"O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen."
I Timothy 6:20-21, KJV

"Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ."
II Corinthians 10:5, KJV


-- from the banner of the home page of the website of the Creation Science Association For Mid-America.

=========================================================

A previous post is about an article by Tom Willis in the newsletter of the Creation Science Association For Mid-America. A new article by Tom Willis -- titled "Evolutionists should not be allowed to roam free in the land" -- in the CSAFMA newsletter says,

Evolution is the apologetic system of the end time religion. It will not be eradicated. Well, not until the antichrist kills all of them in order to promote and make way for worship of himself.

Even then, it will not be the sane people (Christians) who will kill all the evolutionists, it will be the criminally insane folks who worship the antichrist, who will, incidentally, as the Bible predicts, be an Assyrian. Guess who will make up the bulk of the group who kills all the evolutionists! And what is the dominant religion in ancient Assyria and the rest of the countries to be allies of the antichrist? Hint: Every nation named in the Bible as a follower of the antichrist is Muslim today. Thus, it is my theory that it will not, of course, be Christians who kill all the evolutionists, but Muslims who delight in killing both evolutionists and Christians.

Nevertheless, I find it instructive and entertaining to analyze what should be done with evolutionists before their end comes. After all, they are manifestly the most dangerous and destructive people on the planet (well, OK, Muslims are strong competitors). Using their religion to dominate education, they have, as previously pointed out, killed more people than anybody in history . . . . .
.
We have learned:

Evolutionists are largely incompetent

They are largely unproductive leaches (sic) on the productive members of society, else they are totally destructive.

Where they have achieved, or even sought, political power they have virtually always been extremely dangerous to any opponents of their religion, even while pretending they do not have a religion, or pretending they are Christian.

They make it perfectly clear that they are at war and intend to remain at war with Christians and any other opponents of their religion.

Even where they have not achieved the power that their philosophical cousins (communists and Nazis) held, if you pay attention, they tend to make it clear that they believe that Christians, and any other opponents of their faith, ought to be eliminated.

Clearly, then, "evolutionists should not be allowed to roam free in the land." (emphasis in original) All that remains for us to discuss is "What should be done with evolutionists?" For the purposes of this essay, I will ignore the minor issue of Western-style jurisprudence and merely mention possible solutions to the "evolutionism problem," leaving the details to others:

Labor camps. Their fellow believers were high on these. But my position would be that most of them have lived their lives at, or near the public trough. So, after their own beliefs, their life should continue only as long as they can support themselves in the camps.

Require them to wear placards around their neck, or perhaps large medallions which prominently announce "Warning: Evolutionist! Mentally Incompetent -- Potentially Dangerous." I consider this option too dangerous.

Since evolutionists are liars and most do not really believe evolution we could employ truth serum or water-boarding to obtain confessions of evolution rejection. But this should, at most, result in parole, because, like Muslims, evolutionist religion permits them to lie if there is any benefit to them.

An Evolutionist Colony in Antarctica could be a promising option. Of course inspections would be required to prevent too much progress. They might invent gunpowder.

A colony on Mars would prevent gunpowder from harming anyone but their own kind, in the unlikely event they turned out to be intelligent enough to invent it.

All options should include 24-hour sound system playing Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris reading Darwin's "Origin of Species, or the preservation of Favored Races by Means of Natural Selection." Of course some will consider this cruel & unusual, especially since they will undoubtedly have that treatment for eternity.

Wow. I wonder what he thinks of Judge Jones.

But is Tom Willis really more bigoted than the Darwinists who push hardline evolution education policies -- dogmatic, hard sell, constantly in-your-face, evolution-is-central-to-biology, no weaknesses, no disclaimer statements, no-ifs-ands-or-buts, all-criticism-of-evolution-is-just-unconstitutional-religion, brainwashing, spoonfeeding, no-compromise kinds of policies? And is he really more bigoted than the Darwinists who persecute Darwin doubters in academia and government?

A list of CSAFMA newsletter articles is here. The newsletter dates back to 1992.
.

Labels:

7 Comments:

Blogger Jim Sherwood said...

This guy is so extreme that I couldn't believe it at first. I thought that it must be a parody.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:06:00 PM  
Blogger Larry Fafarman said...

Right, Jim, this isn't just a personal article -- the CSAFMA has several staffers. I wonder if the other staffers approve of this article.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008 8:50:00 PM  
Anonymous jim said...

>>"But is Tom Willis really more bigoted than the Darwinists who push hardline evolution education policies -- dogmatic, hard sell, constantly in-your-face, evolution-is-central-to-biology, no weaknesses, no disclaimer statements, no-ifs-and-or-buts, all-criticism-of-evolution-is-just-unconstitutional-religion, brainwashing, spoonfeeding, no-compromise kinds of policies? And is he really more bigoted than the Darwinists who persecute Darwin doubters in academia and government?"<<

Did you actually write this with a straight face?

Wednesday, August 27, 2008 11:29:00 PM  
Blogger Larry Fafarman said...

>>>>>>> Did you actually write this with a straight face? <<<<<<<

It's a rhetorical question. I am trying to make people think about how bigoted those Darwinists are.

Thursday, August 28, 2008 3:16:00 AM  
Blogger Jim Sherwood said...

Willis says that "most evolutionists are liars and most do not really believe in evolution," so I wonder what he thinks that they are up to? Spreading lies or hatching hoaxes just for the fun of it? Anyway, thinking that your opponents are insincere is probably a characteristic of bigots. Similarly, PZ said that Behe is a "pseudoscientific fraud." He thinks, apparently, that Behe doesn't believe what he says. I think that Darwinism is pseudoscience, but I think that proponents of that doctrine are perfectly sincere. They certainly aren't frauds. I wouldn't try to assess whether PZ or Willis is the bigger bigot.

Thursday, August 28, 2008 12:33:00 PM  
Blogger Jim Sherwood said...

Tom Willis is listed as President of CSA, so his views would seem to be at least influential there.

Thursday, August 28, 2008 2:28:00 PM  
Anonymous Michael said...

Tom Wills has a faulty view on biblical prophecy which has lead him to make some extreme remarks. If we were living during the cold war era right now, Tom Wills would be talking about communists taking over, and how Russia was bowing down to the antichrist. Of course back then, people with the same faulty view actually were talking about those things.

And as far as his personal attacks (They are largely unproductive leaches (sic) on the productive members of society, else they are totally destructive.) they are just as bad as when militant atheists go off on Christians. I shake my head at Tom Wills as he is not displaying proper Christian behavior.

Friday, August 29, 2008 2:48:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home