First revision of Texas science standards not posted yet
Labels: Texas controversy (new #1)
This site is named for the famous statement of US Congressman Willard Duncan Vandiver from Missouri : "I`m from Missouri -- you'll have to show me." This site is dedicated to skepticism of official dogma in all subjects. Just-so stories are not accepted here. This is a site where controversial subjects such as evolution theory and the Holocaust may be freely debated.
My biggest motivation for creating my own blogs was to avoid the arbitrary censorship practiced by other blogs and various other Internet forums. Censorship will be avoided in my blogs -- there will be no deletion of comments, no closing of comment threads, no holding up of comments for moderation, and no commenter registration hassles. Comments containing nothing but insults and/or ad hominem attacks are discouraged. My non-response to a particular comment should not be interpreted as agreement, approval, or inability to answer.
Labels: Texas controversy (new #1)
3 Comments:
Not surprising for a delay in getting those proposed science standards online. It's a sign, there might have been a battle going on. Plus public schools tend not to be that organized with efficiency.
What do you mean, "there might have been a battle going on" -- we know that there has been a big battle going on.
This is the second big delay. In the first delay, the Texas Education Agency did not start accepting comments until about four weeks after the original proposed science standards were released and just days before the first revision of the proposed standards was completed. To make matters worse, the TEA initially requested that the comments be submitted on a PDF form that does not allow saving or emailing user-entered data. There was simply no time or not enough time for comments to be reviewed by the standards-drafting committees and the special 6-member review panel.
Your right there, they are not allowing a reasonable amount of time for public imput to be considered.
Like I said, organization is not a strong suit in public schools. There is a great need for decent organization when it comes to handling issues of government education, so that way the public's comments would be attended to.
I'll try to look on the bright side with this one, maybe it will improve once the first draft proposal becomes public online.
Post a Comment
<< Home