Demagogic Darwinists will inevitably link stem cell and evolution controversies
Lumping together unrelated or different viewpoints is the Darwinists' stock-in-trade -- for example, they have done this with intelligent design and creationism.
This site is named for the famous statement of US Congressman Willard Duncan Vandiver from Missouri : "I`m from Missouri -- you'll have to show me." This site is dedicated to skepticism of official dogma in all subjects. Just-so stories are not accepted here. This is a site where controversial subjects such as evolution theory and the Holocaust may be freely debated.
My biggest motivation for creating my own blogs was to avoid the arbitrary censorship practiced by other blogs and various other Internet forums. Censorship will be avoided in my blogs -- there will be no deletion of comments, no closing of comment threads, no holding up of comments for moderation, and no commenter registration hassles. Comments containing nothing but insults and/or ad hominem attacks are discouraged. My non-response to a particular comment should not be interpreted as agreement, approval, or inability to answer.
1 Comments:
It was President Clinton who prevented federal money for the creation of new lines of human embryos for research but kept funding adult stem cell research. When Bush came into office he reaffirm the previous policy.
Even so, setbacks while experimenting with embryonic cells in the lab existed and the explosion of adult stem cell research (which was 2008 science breakthrough of the year), makes embryonic research obsolete but it is being used as a political weapon against those like myself who are against ES research but very much for iPs, and ASC research. And lastly, it's also has to do with greed, they can never get enough funding for a pet project of theirs even in bad economic times.
I agree, the link between evolution and stem cell research is invalid.
Post a Comment
<< Home