Brayton, Take 3
Here's the rule when you deal with cranks and trolls - if you engage them, it proves that their ideas have to be taken seriously; if you ignore them, it shows that you're afraid of their ideas. Heads they win, tails you lose.
Are Darwinists any different? If you don't answer them, then you lose the debate, and if you do answer them, you lose anyway because you don't know what you are talking about and your only reason for discussing anything with them is -- or should be -- to be "educated" by them. Yup, that's right -- heads they win, tails you lose.
Panda's Thumb does not even need to "engage" me -- supposedly all PT has to do is just post a link to my blog so that people can see for themselves how stupid my posts supposedly are. But PT has not even done that.
And banning and deleting commenters -- which Ed Brayton and Panda's Thumb do frequently -- are the surest signs of fear of their ideas.
Postscript:
It is apparent that many people who claim that I just post nonsense have been spending a lot of time reading my comments in great detail. I find that to be very strange, because when it becomes clear to me that someone else just posts nonsense, I very quickly stop wasting my time reading that person's comments.
Labels: Ed Brayton (2 of 2)
9 Comments:
And banning and deleting commenters -- which Ed Brayton and Panda's Thumb do frequently -- are the surest signs of fear of their ideas.
Yeah, that's the first thing I sense when I read Brayton and Panda's Thumb. They're scared shitless of you. You've got it all figured out! You can disprove the entire theory of evolution, and it's only a matter of time before the rest of the civilized world gives up on it altogether!
You, sir, are deserving of a Nobel Prize. You are a true American Hero.
I'll alert the media.
Anonymous said --
>>>>And banning and deleting commenters -- which Ed Brayton and Panda's Thumb do frequently -- are the surest signs of fear of their ideas.
Yeah, that's the first thing I sense when I read Brayton and Panda's Thumb. They're scared shitless of you.<<<<<
If they are not scared shitless of me, then why don't they prove it by unbanning me?
Larry, we read your posts and comments 'cause they are so darned funny in a tragic-train-wreck sort of way.
Anonymous said...
>>>>>Larry, we read your posts and comments 'cause they are so darned funny in a tragic-train-wreck sort of way.<<<<<
Anonymous, my posts & comments would have to be hilarious to justify people spending so much time reading them for that reason. If I were that funny, I could make a good living as a comedian.
Sorry, Anonymous, that explanation just doesn't cut it.
Anonymous said --
>>>>>If they are not scared shitless of me, then why don't they prove it by unbanning me?
Because you're an idiot? Because it's fun to watch you whine? Because you will never, ever, ever, ever, ever win? <<<<<<<
Whatever, Anonymous. They can come up with all the rationalizations that they want to. But I can always argue that the real reason why I am banned is that they are scared shitless of me. Further evidence of that is that no Panda's Thumb article has ever had a link to this blog or even mentioned this blog. They can't see me whine and make a fool of myself if they don't see my stuff.
But I can always argue that the real reason why I am banned is that they are scared shitless of me.
And you can always argue that the holocaust didn't happen, too.
Guess what, Larry. Arguing a case does not make it true.
Just letting you know now the fun has died down, I'm deleting my bookmark to your blog.
Life's too short, Larry.
Bye
Alan Fox said --
>>>>>Just letting you know now the fun has died down, I'm deleting my bookmark to your blog.
Life's too short, Larry.
Bye<<<<<<
Is this something that I need to know? What you do with your own bookmarks is your business. I couldn't care less.
I'm impressed with your site, very nice graphics!
»
Post a Comment
<< Home