Los Angeles Times is one-sided on the controversy
My perceptions as a reader of the Los Angeles Times have been confirmed by the following articles that show that this newspaper is one-sided on the controversy over evolution: this, this, and this. Two of these articles say,
My article "One-sided Los Angeles Times book review". has already noted the L..A. Times' bias against criticism of evolution theory.
As NewsBusters has already reported this year (link), the Los Angeles Times has never published a single article from a leading spokesperson of intelligent design theory.** (Leading spokespeople would include names such as Stephen Meyer, William Dembski, Michael Behe, Jonathan Wells, Guillermo Gonzalez, Jay Wesley Richards, and acclaimed writer Lee Strobel.) Yet the Times has now published its tenth piece in the last 14 months attacking ID! .......
Is there balance at the Los Angeles Times on this issue? Not even close, folks. The Times is unequivocally disserving its readers.
My article "One-sided Los Angeles Times book review". has already noted the L..A. Times' bias against criticism of evolution theory.
Labels: Evolution controversy (4 of 4)
posted by Larry Fafarman | 8/06/2006 01:21:00 PM
3 Comments:
And yet you claim that the Los Angeles Times is written and distributed by supernatural forces. Perhaps the same ones responsible for the "intelligent design".
Well it looks like the troll has not come out of his cave for a while. Perhaps he is still trying to learn to read.
Where are you hiding?
Post a Comment
<< Home