Another summary of Caldwell v. Caldwell
This news article is another summary of the 9th Circuit appeals court's Caldwell v. Caldwell decision. The arbitrariness and capriciousness of the judges' reasoning are readily apparent.
The National Center for Science Education also has a summary of the decision.
The National Center for Science Education also has a summary of the decision.
Labels: Establishment clause (new #2), Evolution education (new #4)
posted by Larry Fafarman | 10/13/2008 05:29:00 PM
3 Comments:
The amazing thing is that, while he evidently understands nothing at all that he reads, Larry's word searches do a great deal to find a lot of material that either supports the evolutionists, or shows the poverty of the creationists' position. He also occasionally draws in well written and informative posts from people such as Kevin Vicklund, who is always kicking his ass.
The entertainment value of seeing Larry totally fall on his face in trying to rebut the arguments of others, followed inevitably by a tirade of insults, and a claim that his opponent has presented no arguments, is just a plus.
We are always kicking Larry's butt. That's why he doesn't like us.
You lousy dunghill, even your big hero Fatheaded Ed Brayton deplores the denial of standing here -- he said, "As usual, I don't like seeing cases get dismissed based on the court's artificial and unjustified standing doctrine."
If I said that bears shit in the woods, you would disagree just for the sake of disagreeing with me. You have no credibility.
I would like to delete asinine comments that just say that I am wrong without giving a reason why, but deleting such comments often creates more problems for me because of my general no-censorship policy, which I am often falsely accused of violating (I now delete only (1) gossip about my private affairs and (2) outright lies about objective facts). Those comments just clutter up this blog with garbage, which is why you lousy trolls post them here.
> my general no-censorship policy, which I am often falsely accused of violating <
Not falsely.
> I now delete only (1) gossip about my private affairs <
However you have redefined things that say nothing about you as "gossip about your private affairs" just to hypocritically censor them.
> and (2) outright lies about objective facts). <
You don't censor your own outright lies about objective facts such as misinterpreting what ViU said rather than quote him verbatim.
Post a Comment
<< Home