First Darwin and Lincoln, and now Darwin and Hitler
I think that it is certainly OK to discuss the political, social, and philosophical implications and consequences of Darwinism and scientific criticisms of Darwinism. However, Darwinism and scientific criticisms of Darwinism should be judged on the basis of their scientific merits alone. A lot of people just can't keep issues separate when it is appropriate to do so. For example, for a long time I have wanted to post my doubts about official Holocaust history but I have refrained from doing so because of fear of hurting my case against Darwinism. There are trolls on this blog who have tried to discredit my arguments against Darwinism by pointing out my opposition to California's grossly unconstitutional "smog impact fee," which was declared to be unconstitutional by the courts.