Hypocritical Ed Brayton supports gay "rights" while opposing free speech
Self-righteous hypocrite BVD-clad blogger Fatheaded Ed Brayton is a big supporter of the "right" of gay marriage while he violates freedom of speech by arbitrarily censoring blog visitors' comments. Ed is straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel.
On Michigan Messenger, Fatheaded Ed discussed his attendance at an event called "Seven Straight Nights for Equal Rights." Ed's quote from someone else's essay says, "I support gay marriage because I love to go to weddings, and this means more of them." Sounds like a wedding-party crasher who likes the free food.
Ed must be gay himself. There is no other reasonable explanation for his dedication in pushing gay marriage.
Bans on gay marriage are treated like some kind of crime against humanity. With a few exceptions, gays have it pretty good in the USA. Gays moan about all the things that they supposedly cannot do because they can't get married. Well, you can even bequeath your assets to your dog. You can probably even arrange to have your dog visit you at a hospital (a lot of hospitals use pet therapy). Just about the only thing that you can't do with a dog is give it power of attorney -- so maybe dog-lovers should be complaining that they can't marry their dogs.
Also, IMO supporting gay marriage without also supporting plural marriage is inconsistent.
Ed, really, your support for gay marriage is OK with me. But you can't claim to be in favor of human rights while you violate freedom of speech by arbitrarily censoring blog visitors' comments.
BTW, blog visitors' comments are arbitrarily censored precisely because they are good comments. The bloggers delete the comments because they are unable to counter them. There is no reason to arbitrarily censor comments that are bad or that can be refuted or countered.
On Michigan Messenger, Fatheaded Ed discussed his attendance at an event called "Seven Straight Nights for Equal Rights." Ed's quote from someone else's essay says, "I support gay marriage because I love to go to weddings, and this means more of them." Sounds like a wedding-party crasher who likes the free food.
Ed must be gay himself. There is no other reasonable explanation for his dedication in pushing gay marriage.
Bans on gay marriage are treated like some kind of crime against humanity. With a few exceptions, gays have it pretty good in the USA. Gays moan about all the things that they supposedly cannot do because they can't get married. Well, you can even bequeath your assets to your dog. You can probably even arrange to have your dog visit you at a hospital (a lot of hospitals use pet therapy). Just about the only thing that you can't do with a dog is give it power of attorney -- so maybe dog-lovers should be complaining that they can't marry their dogs.
Also, IMO supporting gay marriage without also supporting plural marriage is inconsistent.
Ed, really, your support for gay marriage is OK with me. But you can't claim to be in favor of human rights while you violate freedom of speech by arbitrarily censoring blog visitors' comments.
BTW, blog visitors' comments are arbitrarily censored precisely because they are good comments. The bloggers delete the comments because they are unable to counter them. There is no reason to arbitrarily censor comments that are bad or that can be refuted or countered.
Labels: Ed Brayton (new #1)
posted by Larry Fafarman | 10/16/2007 12:21:00 PM
9 Comments:
> he violates freedom of speech by arbitrarily censoring blog visitors' comments. <
Repeating this lie endlessly will not make it true. You can not give a single example of where Ed has arbitrarily censored blog visitors' comments. He has banned you for your outrageous behaviour and that ban goes to all of your comments, no matter how easily they can be refuted.
> Ed must be gay himself. There is no other reasonable explanation for his dedication in pushing gay marriage. <
There is no other reasonable explanation that you can understand. That is a far cry from there being no reasonable explanation. Incidentally, I am not in favor of the government being involved in marriages, gay or straight.
> Also, IMO supporting gay marriage without also supporting plural marriage is inconsistent. <
I don't see any connection, nor have you given one.
> you can't claim to be in favor of human rights while you violate freedom of speech by arbitrarily censoring visitors' comments. <
But he doesn't. You do, however, as is widely known.
> BTW, blog visitors' comments are arbitrarily censored precisely because they are good comments. <
How would you know? Have you ever made a good comment?
> There is no reason to arbitrarily censor comments that are bad or that can be refuted or countered. <
Unlike you, Ed does not arbitrarily censor comments. Your bad and easily refuted and countered comments are taken off because you were banned for cause.
>>>>>> Repeating this lie endlessly will not make it true. <<<<<<
What makes you think that repeating your lies endlessly will make them true, dunghill?
Youse guise need better writers with some new and snappier material.
> Ed must be gay himself. There is no other reasonable explanation for his dedication in pushing gay marriage. <
Ed may be gay. Or, more likely IMO, he is just a sick capital L Liberal who cannot tell the difference.
> Also, IMO supporting gay marriage without also supporting plural marriage is inconsistent. <
Consistency also suggests supporting marriages to animals, as long as the sheep or camel or whatever consents to the arrangement.
Moulton said...
>>>>> Youse guise need better writers with some new and snappier material. <<<<<<
What is snappier than exposing the hypocrisy of BVD-clad yellow-journalist blogger Fatheaded Ed Brayton?
What do you expect? Have you seen the crap that is posted on other blogs?
I could post a lot more articles if I merely used the subjects of articles posted on other blogs. But I don't want to post copycat or me-too articles -- I want my articles to be unique or unusual.
> What is snappier than exposing the hypocrisy of BVD-clad yellow-journalist blogger Fatheaded Ed Brayton? <
Then why don't you do it? Instead you have continued your lies.
Methinks something like this would be snappier...
Tell Me Why
What is snappier than exposing the hypocrisy of BVD-clad yellow-journalist blogger Fatheaded Ed Brayton?
Let me help you out:
snappy: Lively or energetic; brisk. Smart or chic.
In The Boxer, Simon and Garfunkel sang, "I have squandered my resistance for a pocketful of mumbles, such are promises. All lies and jest; still a man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest."
Evidently lies and jest drive these ferchachta blogs more than dialogue.
So it goes.
Post a Comment
<< Home