Even if evolution is true -- discussing criticisms of it enhances understanding of it and biology in general
The taboo against criticizing evolution is extremely anti-science and anti-intellectual.
I have been banned from many Darwinist blogs because my arguments against evolution were too persuasive. In contrast, the Panda's Thumb blog now has two creationist trolls, FL and IBELIEVEINGOD, who submit really nonsensical comments, but these trolls are allowed to stay in order to (1) give a false image of tolerance and open-mindedness and (2) give the false impression that opposing arguments are weak.
I have been banned from many Darwinist blogs because my arguments against evolution were too persuasive. In contrast, the Panda's Thumb blog now has two creationist trolls, FL and IBELIEVEINGOD, who submit really nonsensical comments, but these trolls are allowed to stay in order to (1) give a false image of tolerance and open-mindedness and (2) give the false impression that opposing arguments are weak.
posted by Larry Fafarman | 3/22/2011 05:37:00 PM
2 Comments:
That was uncalled for, other Anonymous.
To anyone reading this, assuming Larry doesn't censor this like he censors about 40% of my comments, FL and IBIG are allowed to post because they haven't broken the posted rules. Larry on the other hand was banned because he impersonated a number of regular commentators at PT.
>>>>To anyone reading this, assuming Larry doesn't censor this like he censors about 40% of my comments<<<<<
I never ban anyone. All comments
are considered on a case by case basis.
>>>>>Larry on the other hand was banned because he impersonated a number of regular commentators at PT.<<<<
Wrong. There were big mistakes and misunderstandings. The real story is here
PT was just looking for an excuse to get rid of me because my comments were just too darn good.
What about the other Darwinist blogs that have banned me:?
Post a Comment
<< Home