Why isn't heliocentrism as controversial as evolution?
There are two reasons--(1)heliocentrism is far more credible than evolution; (2)heliocentrism is based on what is seen to be happening now, whereas evolution theory is mostly based on circumstantial evidence of events that no one was here to witness.
And we can forget about the flat earth theory, a popular Darwinist straw man -- this has been exposed as a gigantic hoax.[1][2 ]
Awake! magazine, published by Jehovah's Witnesses --often critcizes evolution theory , but the criticisms I have seen there were mostly based on science -- usually incredulity that evolution could produce things of such great complexity or sophistication. In fact, there is a regular column titled, "Was It Designed?" I never saw the following arguments against evolution: (1)that it is wrong solely because it conflicts with the Bible ( though Awake! might incidentally point out that the theory conflicts with the Bible) ; or(2)no one was here to see evolution take place.
Darwinists' insistence that religion is the only reason for questioning evolution theory is very disingenuous.
And we can forget about the flat earth theory, a popular Darwinist straw man -- this has been exposed as a gigantic hoax.[1][2 ]
Awake! magazine, published by Jehovah's Witnesses --often critcizes evolution theory , but the criticisms I have seen there were mostly based on science -- usually incredulity that evolution could produce things of such great complexity or sophistication. In fact, there is a regular column titled, "Was It Designed?" I never saw the following arguments against evolution: (1)that it is wrong solely because it conflicts with the Bible ( though Awake! might incidentally point out that the theory conflicts with the Bible) ; or(2)no one was here to see evolution take place.
Darwinists' insistence that religion is the only reason for questioning evolution theory is very disingenuous.
posted by Larry Fafarman | 5/04/2011 05:42:00 PM
5 Comments:
OMFG are you serious the flat earth theory is out?! Guess what, that theory has been out of debate for a long time.
Evolution isn't based on circumstantial evidence either, we can observe evolution on a micro scale with bacteria.
http://images.4chan.org/gif/src/1304632615072.gif
>>>>>OMFG are you serious the flat earth theory is out?! Guess what, that theory has been out of debate for a long time.<<<<<
Hardly.
>>>>>Evolution isn't based on circumstantial evidence either, we can observe evolution on a micro scale with bacteria.<<<<
Micro not macro.
How is the FLAT EARTH theory not out of debate? People have flown around the world, sailed around the world, and the human race has satellites that orbit around the earth. It is a proven fact that Earth is not flat, and it gets proven every day.
If you truly believe there is any merit in the idea of a flat earth, than nothing you say can be taken seriously.
And your response to the other Anonymous commenter of, "Micro not macro." Is a form of agreement that there is evolution on a Micro scale. If you agree with that, they how can you negate any form of evolution? Evolution is evolution whether on a micro or macro scale.
>>>>>>>How is the FLAT EARTH theory not out of debate? People have flown around the world, sailed around the world, and the human race has satellites that orbit around the earth. It is a proven fact that Earth is not flat, and it gets proven every day. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
You stupid dunghill, I said that it is a Darwinist straw man, not that it is a subject of serious debate. What a loon.
>>>> Evolution is evolution whether on a micro or macro scale<<<
Look up the difference between micro- and macro-evolution.
Post a Comment
<< Home