Creationist rap music

This amusing website has creationist rap music. Here are some of the lyrics, misspellings included:

SONG: REMEMBERED AS DRAGONS

SO TAKE YOUR RADIOMETRIC DECAY
AND YOUR CARBON 14 AND JUST PUT AWAY
WE WONT BE SWAYED FROM THE TRUTH BY YOUR NONSENSE
WE WILL PROTEST AND REQUEST YOU CHANGE CONTENTS
AND RECOGNIZE THAT YOU BUILT YOUR CLAIMS ON PRETENSE
AND ADMIT THAT EVOLUTION IS A MYTH OF PSEUDOSCIENCE
SOME SCIENTISTS WONT ADMIT THAT BEING ATHEIST
COULD MAKE THEM BIASED WHEN INTERPRETING THE EVIDENCE
THEY THINK WERE ACCIDENTS THERE INTELLECT IS ARROGANT
MANY DISMISS AND NEGLECT WHAT IS RELEVANT
LIKE THE DISCOVERY OF COELACANTH
THIS LIVING FOSSIL IN A FISH MARKET
TORE IN HALF THE FOSSIL RECORD
INCONVENIENT FOR THE SEASONED PROFESSIONALS
LIKE PROFESSORS AND PROFESSED INTELLECTUALS
THERE OBSERVATIONS GOTTA FIT PREVAILING PARADIGMS

SONG: THE PLANET OF THE APES

WHATa€™S YOUR SPECIES? WHATa€™S YOUR ORIGIN?
WE OWE OUR LIVES TO GOD BUT WERE IGNORING HIM
WHAT DO WE EXPECT WHEN THE WHOLE HUMAN RACE
THINKS WERE JUST A MISTAKE LIKE THE PLANET OF THE APES?

- - - - - - -

ARE WE JUST A ZOO FULL OF PEOPLE CONVINCED THAT WE ARE EQUAL
TO AN ANIMAL LEVEL THATa€™S EVIL STRAIGHT FROM THE DEVIL
YOU CAN SEE IT UNRAVEL LIKE THE TOWER OF BABEL
TELL US WERE KNUCKLE DRAGGIN MONKEYS LIKE ON ANIMAL PLANET
WERE JUST EXAMPLES OF MAMMALS ALTHOUGH EXTRAVAGANT SAMPLES
THEY TRAMPLE OVER TRUTH JUST LIKE A TRAMPLING MAMMOTH
ARE YOU AMAZED BY THIS EVOLUTION CRAZE?

LOL

To play the song, click on one of the triangles preceding the song title (the first triangle is "lo-fi," presumably for modem connections, and the second triangle is "hi-fi," presumably for broadband connections). It sounds just like gangsta rap.

READ MORE

Darwinist roots of the Holocaust

The minutes of the infamous Wannsee Conference say,

Under proper guidance, in the course of the final solution the Jews are to be allocated for appropriate labor in the East. Able-bodied Jews, separated according to sex, will be taken in large work columns to these areas for work on roads, in the course of which action doubtless a large portion will be eliminated by natural causes. The possible final remnant will, since it will undoubtedly consist of the most resistant portion, have to be treated accordingly, because it is the product of natural selection and would, if released, act as a the seed of a new Jewish revival (see the experience of history.)
(emphasis added)

But the holocaust "experts" say that there is no evidence whatsoever that Darwinism influenced the Nazis. Nosirree.

READ MORE

Why this blog has been slowing down

This blog has really been slowing down lately. When I started out, I tried to post an article about once every one or two days -- now I post only about 2-3 articles per month. The main reason for that is that I have run out of things to say on the subjects I have been blogging about -- mostly the evolution controversy and the holocaust. This blog was created mainly to present my unorthodox views on these subjects because I was banned and censored on so many other blogs. I don't have a lot to say about these subjects because I try to reduce the debates to the simplest terms. For example, on the subject of evolution v. religion, I have just one simple question for Darwinist cafeteria Christians: Considering that the bible's creation story makes much more sense than the gospel, why do you take the gospel literally while not taking the creation story literally? The creation story is fairly straightforward whereas the gospel is full of illogic, ambiguities, inconsistencies, and unintelligibility, and the creation story is consistent with the idea of an all-powerful god whereas the god of the gospel is a weak, limited god who must struggle against Satan for control of the world. I feel that unless the Darwinist cafeteria Christians can satisfactorily answer that question -- and I don't think they can -- or at least admit that they cannot satisfactorily answer it, then to me they have no credibility, and I therefore have no desire to debate them further. However, the debates about evolution v. religion go on endlessly on other blogs. My comments about the holocaust have also been an attempt to present issues in very simple terms -- my main argument has been that a "systematic" holocaust was impossible because the Nazis had no objective and reliable way(s) of identifying Jews and non-Jews. My main criticism of evolution theory has been about co-evolution (i.e., adaptation to other organisms as opposed to adaptation to the physical environment -- co-evolution is sometimes defined as mutual adaptation between organisms) -- I have argued that co-evolution is a big problem for evolution theory even where there is no doubt that the individual co-dependent traits are not "intelligently designed" and can arise through random mutation. I argue that in co-evolution, unlike in evolutionary adaptation to widespread fixed physical features of the environment, e.g., air, water, and land in its various forms, there may be nothing to adapt to because the corresponding co-dependent trait in the other organism is likely to be initially absent. Thus, I can avoid the issue of intelligent design altogether. However, a lot of people seem to think that ID is the only criticism of evolution theory.

A lot of trolls claim that my arguments were refuted a long time ago, whereas the truth is that many of my arguments are practically unheard of.

I will try to continue posting articles from time to time. Getting into new subjects will help.

READ MORE